Performance Zone is brought to you in partnership with:

Developer with experience in a variety of different systems and technologies, with a customer focus and balance with business goals. Particularly interested in backend and large scale systems, and also interested in high level architecture, and API design. Always open to feedback in order to keep learning and improving as a professional. Rodrigo is a DZone MVB and is not an employee of DZone and has posted 39 posts at DZone. You can read more from them at their website. View Full User Profile

Performance Review

12.17.2012
| 2311 views |
  • submit to reddit
It's not a surprise that Microsoft's performance review has been so debated in the past few years, and more recently after Vanity's Fair post on "Microsoft's Downfall". If you haven't heard of how the performance review works at Microsoft, I'd suggest you read these couple of blog post and article:

Microsoft Stack Ranking is not Good Management
Microsoft’s Downfall: Inside the Executive E-mails and Cannibalistic Culture That Felled a Tech Giant

However, what surprised is to come across some posts on how Google does its performance review. From recruiters, I knew all about the wonders that peer feedback are at Google and how things are more fair.

I did not know, though, the different side of the coin. Read it here:

What are the major deficiencies of the performance review process at Google?
Promotion Systems
Promotions System Redux

Essentially, the problems with performance review are everywhere at big companies. I wonder how well it works at Valve, as it has a non-traditional organization structure.
Published at DZone with permission of Rodrigo De Castro, author and DZone MVB. (source)

(Note: Opinions expressed in this article and its replies are the opinions of their respective authors and not those of DZone, Inc.)