Java += and implicit casting
Until today I thought that for example:
i += j;
is just a shortcut for:
i = i + j;
But what if we try this:
int i =5;long j =8;
i = i + j;will not compile but
i += j;will compile fine.
Does it mean that in fact
i += j;is a shortcut for something like this
i = (type of i) (i + j)?
I've tried googling for it but couldn't find anything relevant.
As always with these questions, the JLS holds the answer. In this case §15.26.2 Compound Assignment Operators. An extract:
A compound assignment expression of the form E1 op= E2 is equivalent to E1 = (T)((E1) op (E2)), where T is the type of E1, except that E1 is evaluated only once.
And an example:
For example, the following code is correct:
short x =3; x +=4.6;and results in x having the value 7 because it is equivalent to:
short x =3; x =(short)(x +4.6);
In other words, your assumption is correct.
A good example of this casting is using *= or /=
byte b =10; b *=5.7;System.out.println(b);// prints 57
byte b =100; b /=2.5;System.out.println(b);// prints 40
char ch ='0'; ch *=1.1;System.out.println(ch);// prints '4'
char ch ='A'; ch *=1.5;System.out.println(ch);// prints 'a'
(Note: Opinions expressed in this article and its replies are the opinions of their respective authors and not those of DZone, Inc.)